Follow related website bookmark from Reddit:
Recently, things changed in a very significant way toward truth. This is the necessary README file.
**tl;dr:** This [link](http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/04/us-recants-claims-that-tortured.html) is the biggest piece of news about 9/11 since 9/11/01. Thus, this is a fairly long wall of text explaining the significance of it. If you care, you'll read both the link and this commentary. ***** "I know kung fu." - *Neo* "Show me." - *Morpheus* ***** **README** This information is presented in the *spirit* of a computer program README file. Having written some sourcecode documentation in my time, I know that comments are appreciated when a program is extremely complex. Starting with a thorough, but relatively concise README. So, following the spirit of that concept, this is a sort of 'walk through' for those who haven't actually been mulling around in this rabbit hole very much. You'll only have to read this one post (the links are optional clarifications) to understand the whole issue: What just changed, and what it means for the future of 9/11 news coverage. ***** **REINTRODUCING THE EVIDENCE** Allow me to [re]introduce you to Abu Zubaydah. Abu Zubaydah is the man who was diagnosed as schizophrenic (with complications due to a head injury a couple years before 2001), who was waterboarded 83 times in a single year, and who was the first person who claimed to actually be a member of a secret organization called "al Ciada" (pronounced: al KI uh duh). **NOTE:** "al Ciada" is the original spelling under which the name of this "terrorist organization" was announced in the MSM. Immediately, it underwent a series of transformations: al Ciada - al Caida - al Kaida - al Qaida - al Qaeda <-- the current "official" mainstream media spelling of... the name of what?. Take just a moment to reflect and remember this guy and the news controversy which surrounded him and his "confession". This was the hinge-pin of the government's account - it was an "iff/then" proposition from the outset (if, and only if, this confession is valid, then the CIA has a large database it can consult to start "building a network"). All other extended information relating to the "official story" stemmed from this one point. They had this one, and only one, "confession" of a "secret terrorist organization" ... from a seriously mentally ill person whom they had tortured mercilessly. Additionally, without this "confession" they had no story, just a list of names of "assets" in a large CIA database (including, but not limited to, Tim Osman, aka Osama bin Laden). **A L**arge **CIA D**atabase of **A**ssets. AL CIADA <-- The original name (and original spelling of that name) by which this "terrorist organization" was announced to the entire world on 9/11, within hours (minutes?) of planes hitting the WTC towers. Prior to 9/11, "al qaeda" didn't mean anything, not even in Arabic - it was gibberish. Now, in Iraq, "al qaeda" means "the toilet" - as a way of mocking the Bush Administration's invention of this fantasy crap. Yeah, but this is all "conspiracy theory", right? I mean... they got the "confession" and they're standing by it. Right? Wrong. ***** **RECANTING THE OLD EVIDENCE** The US has recently (just days ago) recanted the claim that this man was part of any organization named "al Ciada", or that he **ever even knew of any such organization** named "al Ciada". Thanks, washingtonsblog, for delivering this piece of news. [link](http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/04/us-recants-claims-that-tortured.html) ***** **REBUILDING THE TRUTH** This breaks "iff/then" ("if and only if, then...") and sets up an additonal "catch-22". * First, the catch-22 is this: the (now recanted) claim was that Abu Zubaydah gave them this information prior to having been tortured, and that the torture (according to the lie told by Dick Cheney) resulted in additional information; yet, in truth, it resulted in nothing. Meaning: this mentally ill man (who'd had a severe head injury only a couple years earlier) was tortured mercilessly 83 times in a single year for no reason. He had no information and the CIA **knew it**. * Second, the broken "iff/then" is this: Removing this confession from the house of cards (upon which all other references to a "terrorist network" since then have been built) means there is no "terrorst network", there never was, -- there is no "al Ciada" separate from "A Large CIA Database of Assets". [link](http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=there+is+no+al+qaeda&aq=0&aqi=g1&aql=&oq=there+is+no+al+) -- the whole house of cards caves in, including the justification for torture at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib. This is the little lie that sealed up the big lie of the WTC's destruction and the coverup for all subsequent atrocities committed by this administration; removal of this little lie makes the rest of the lie apparent. No "al Ciada" means no "al Ciada terrorists" to blame the plane hijackings on; thus, the whole "official 9/11 cover story" was lie. This immediately brings the airplane manifests back into the spotlight along with the purported "19 hijackers", which has consistently and repeatedly been swept under the rug for 9 years (Also note that, currently, the US is actively using drone aircraft in Iraq/Afghanistan -- DRONE AIRCRAFT. Hellooooooo.). Osama bin Laden is not now, nor has he ever been, wanted by the FBI. [link](http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/seekin.php?q=seekin.php) The next two "big threatening bad guy terrorists", who published videos which were aired repeatedly on national television, turned out to be two Jewish guys dressed up for dramatic effect. Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves is a lie. [link](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mztfFdpd1Rk) This is the one logical/legal issue which unravels everything connected to it. What was, only days ago, conspiracy theory is now conspiracy fact. Karl Rove has now become the proud architect of a lying administration. [link](http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/architect/) Please, people age 24+, remember 9/11/01, the events surrounding it, and the way it unfolded; remember Abu Zubaydah; and please, wake up now, sort through this logical blunder in your own mind, then help explain this to those who've been deafened by the constantly repeating drone of the "official story". Discomfort with the findings of the 9/11 Commission are no longer conspiracy theories, this one change of stance by the US Government is the beginning of 9/11 truth. Follow this one tiny thread... the unraveling of Abu Zubaydah . ***** Now, here's the part which may fly in the faces of some out there who have been influenced by the flow of the media political filters... This is the result of a constitutional law professor President representing the people of his country in good faith. A decent, honest man, doing an honest day's work in the oval office. I hope to see troops coming home *very soon*. Say goodbye to the GOP (and Sarah Palin!!!), say hello to Jesse Ventura (and, hopefully, a new era of open information),... and keep a close eye on President Obama's fate. [link](http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=137773) The 3rd Circuit Court is planning to hear arguments on this "counter conspiracy theory" from the wingnuts on the far right. For the sake of rebuilding the integrity of the USA under the leadership of a man who appears to be holding office with the utmost integrity of any President I've seen since JFK, I want to point out that NONE of the first SEVEN presidents were born in the United States of America (nor was John McCain, by the way). Yet, two reputable Hawaiian newspapers had birth announcements for Barack Obama... at a time when Certificates of Live Birth were still a new and not thoroughly implemented bureaucratic procedure. There is no precedent for requiring an "official birth certificate" for a person born during a time when there was no such thing. This frivolous court case is simply political mud-slinging by many of the same individuals who have been re-enforcing the "official 9/11 cover story" -- which has now formally recanted its founding premise and is soon to be debunked and dismantled. ***** So, who did 9/11? Who's "doing it" to us now? What's going on? The CIA? The Israeli Mossad? The Cheney/Bush administration? Larry Silverstein? The Bilderberg Group? The Tri Lateral Commission? Is it for greed? Is it for oil? Is it for religious conquest? Is it for establishing a New World Order? Probably. [link](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Aristocrats_%28film%29) Probably a little of all of these and more, yes. A convergence of forces playing upon one another, all hinged upon a corrupt administration's hubris and lust for power, and a "theory" based upon the single "confession" of a mentally ill man. Thanks, Karl. Thanks, Dick. Thanks, Larry. Thanks, "Rummy". Thanks for making "patriotism" the rallying cry of the corrupt, while making out the truly patriotic to be "conspiracy theorists". ***** So, are **all** of the conspiracy theories right? Probably to a certain extent, yes. And yes, "they" (whoever "*they*" are) probably want to "snuff out Obama" in the same way he just "snuffed out bin Laden". All of the theories have elements of accuracy, but no specific theory exists in a vaccuum. This is going to be very interesting to watch as it unfolds. ***** But, what happens now? Now, we watch. No one can be certain what will happen next, however... It does, quite suddenly, re-open the prospect of a new 9/11 investigation. Every scrap of evidence and every alternate possibility which was excluded from the initial investigation is potentially (and suddenly!) back on the table. In the words of Dr. Judy Wood, "This changes everything." [links](http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/bhcss/what_are_the_implications_of_dr_judy_woods_theory/) EDIT: Typos, clarifications, formatting. more